Oblique kick - UFC/MMA
In the UFC, the oblique kick is executed with either the lead or rear foot targeting the opponent's knee area, driving in with a descending oblique angle. The goal is to hyperextend the knee or destabilize the opponent's leg. This technique sparks debate within the MMA community due to its potential for serious joint damage, yet it remains perfectly legal under unified rules. The oblique kick is particularly advantageous for fighters looking to keep their distance without committing to riskier kicks. Jon Jones is the fighter most associated with the oblique kick in the UFC, employing it systematically to wear down opponents' legs and control distance. Defense against it is challenging because the kick targets a low area and strikes with an unconventional trajectory.
Oblique kick
Jon Jones has utilized the oblique kick as a tactical weapon in nearly all of his UFC fights, consistently targeting his opponents' lead knees. This technique has allowed him to maintain distance while inflicting damage to his challengers' legs.
Oblique kick & Teep
The oblique kick and the teep are both push kicks used for distance management. The teep pushes the opponent back by striking the body, while the oblique kick targets the knee with a descending trajectory. The teep is generally safer and more accepted, whereas the oblique kick is more controversial but potentially more damaging. Teep.
FAQ - Oblique kick
Is the oblique kick controversial in the UFC?
Yes, many fighters and commentators believe that direct kicks to the knee should be banned due to the risk of serious joint injuries. However, current rules allow them.
How do you defend against the oblique kick?
The best defense is footwork: staying out of range and moving laterally. Lifting the leg to avoid direct contact with the knee and countering when the fighter exposes themselves are other options.
